Fwd: * Social justice * [ Book: PROUT in a Nutshell, Part 01:04]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Anandasamarpana anandamargii
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 22:34:04 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: * Social justice * [ Book: PROUT in a Nutshell, Part 01:04]
To: "Latest Topic - *EDUCATION* by P. R. Sarkar [Book: PROUT in a
Nutshell, Part 01:03]" <discussonprout@googlegroups.com>

Social justice by P. R. Sarkar
Different groups of people contribute to the building of society in
different ways. This diversity carries a special significance for the
social structure as a whole. If diversity had not existed, human
society would not have advanced even as faras the Stone Age, let
alonethe present stage of civilization. So we have toimpartially
consider and support all the diverse ideas, forms and colours which
are conducive to fostering personal growthand social development among
human beings. If we fail to do so, that section of society which has
been built around a particular idea, form or colour will wither and
die.I direct this not only to those who think deeply about social
welfare, but to all members of society, to impress upon them that no
one, through theirthoughts, words or actions, should ever condone
injustice. To enjoy full topic pls click here:
http://proutist.fi/content/social-justice-p-r-sarkar

Fwd: *EDUCATION* by P. R. Sarkar [Book: PROUT in a Nutshell, Part 01:03]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Anandasamarpana anandamargii
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 03:24:02 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: *EDUCATION* by P. R. Sarkar [Book: PROUT in a Nutshell, Part
01:03]
To: "Latest Topic - * The Evolution of Society * [Book:PROUT in a
Nutshell-01:01]" <discussonprout@googlegroups.com>

Education by P. R. Sarkar
Parents(1) often allege that teachers do not teachanything worthwhile
nowadays, but I do not feel that this is a very well-considered
remark. In actual fact they are only making excuses in order to avoid
their responsibilities. At the same time, however, I should add that
most teachers demonstrate, through their mental outlook or their
actions, far less awareness of theirsocial responsibilities
thanconcern for their own interests. They do not devote even a
fraction of the time and energy to building society that they spend
making money by any means possible, such as by writing "made
easies" [course summaries] or study guides. For more pls click here:
http://proutist.fi/content/education-p-r-sarkar

Fwd: *Moralism by P. R. Sarkar* [Book: PROUT in a Nutshell Part-01:02]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Anandasamarpana anandamargii
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 01:59:37 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: *Moralism by P. R. Sarkar* [Book: PROUT in a Nutshell
Part-01:02]
To: "Latest Topic - * The Evolution of Society * [Book:PROUT in a
Nutshell-01:01]" <discussonprout@googlegroups.com>

Moralism by P. R. Sarkar
The inner spirit of the word samája ["society"] is"to move together".
That is, the vitality of society depends on two factors: its existence
– a collective creation – and its inherentdynamism. The characteristic
of an activating force is that it does not move in a perfectly
straight line, rather its movement is rhythmic or undulating; and this
rhythm or wave is not monomorphic but systaltic. The force that moves
society forward is also systaltic. When the nature of movement of
individual life does not hinder the rhythm of collective movement of
society, there remains the possibility of forming a society from the
collectivemovement of numerous individuals – there lies thepossibility
of creating a universal intellectual structure inspired by the
brilliance of sublime ideas.
If we try to judge the nature of something by analysing the inner
spirit of the word used to describe it, we will have to say without
hesitation that humanity has not yetlearned how to build a "society"
worthy of the name. Even to this day, people have only a very vague
notion of the reasons for needing society, let alone of how to build a
true society.
Movement means the active effort to destroy anexisting structure and
construct another. The very effort to destroy old, worn-out systems
gives rise to the possibility of creating newer systems and codes. It
is wrong to infer that because a force is temporarily static after
being attacked it is inert; it still possesses the potential to strike
back. Ofcourse the force under attack tends to absorb thestriking
force in an effort to survive, but it cannot do this successfully. I
havealready explained why. Toretard the systalticity of the movement
of the striking force is contrary to the characteristics of force.
That is why vested interests cannot hold backthe progress of society.
For more pls click here: http://proutist.fi/content/moralism-p-r-sarkar

Fwd: *Moralism by P. R. Sarkar* [Book: PROUT in a Nutshell Part-01:02]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Anandasamarpana anandamargii
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 01:59:37 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: *Moralism by P. R. Sarkar* [Book: PROUT in a Nutshell
Part-01:02]
To: "Latest Topic - * The Evolution of Society * [Book:PROUT in a
Nutshell-01:01]" <discussonprout@googlegroups.com>

Moralism by P. R. Sarkar
The inner spirit of the word samája ["society"] is"to move together".
That is, the vitality of society depends on two factors: its existence
– a collective creation – and its inherentdynamism. The characteristic
of an activating force is that it does not move in a perfectly
straight line, rather its movement is rhythmic or undulating; and this
rhythm or wave is not monomorphic but systaltic. The force that moves
society forward is also systaltic. When the nature of movement of
individual life does not hinder the rhythm of collective movement of
society, there remains the possibility of forming a society from the
collectivemovement of numerous individuals – there lies thepossibility
of creating a universal intellectual structure inspired by the
brilliance of sublime ideas.
If we try to judge the nature of something by analysing the inner
spirit of the word used to describe it, we will have to say without
hesitation that humanity has not yetlearned how to build a "society"
worthy of the name. Even to this day, people have only a very vague
notion of the reasons for needing society, let alone of how to build a
true society.
Movement means the active effort to destroy anexisting structure and
construct another. The very effort to destroy old, worn-out systems
gives rise to the possibility of creating newer systems and codes. It
is wrong to infer that because a force is temporarily static after
being attacked it is inert; it still possesses the potential to strike
back. Ofcourse the force under attack tends to absorb thestriking
force in an effort to survive, but it cannot do this successfully. I
havealready explained why. Toretard the systalticity of the movement
of the striking force is contrary to the characteristics of force.
That is why vested interests cannot hold backthe progress of society.
For more pls click here: http://proutist.fi/content/moralism-p-r-sarkar

Fwd: * The evolution of society * [Book: PROUT IN A NUTSHELL - Part -1]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Anandasamarpana anandamargii
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 07:35:43 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: * The evolution of society * [Book: PROUT IN A NUTSHELL -
Part -1]
To: "Latest Topic - *Liberation from staticity*[PROUT in a Nutshell,
Book-8: Part-5]" <discussonprout@googlegroups.com>

* The evolution of society * [Book: PROUT IN A NUTSHELL - Part -1]

" No social class should dominate society. If one class is dominant
the other classes will surely be exploited. Therefore everyone is to
be guaranteed equal opportunities and equal rights." - P.R.Sarkar

To enjoy more pls. click here >

http://proutist.fi/content/evolution-society-p-r-sarkarELL - Part -1]

" No social class should dominate society. If one class is dominant
the other classes will surely be exploited. Therefore everyone is to
be guaranteed equal opportunities and equal rights." - P.R.Sarkar

To enjoy more pls. click here >

http://proutist.fi/content/evolution-society-p-r-sarkar

Fwd: * The evolution of society * [Book: PROUT IN A NUTSHELL - Part -1]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Anandasamarpana anandamargii
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 07:35:43 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: * The evolution of society * [Book: PROUT IN A NUTSHELL -
Part -1]
To: "Latest Topic - *Liberation from staticity*[PROUT in a Nutshell,
Book-8: Part-5]" <discussonprout@googlegroups.com>

* The evolution of society * [Book: PROUT IN A NUTSHELL - Part -1]

" No social class should dominate society. If one class is dominant
the other classes will surely be exploited. Therefore everyone is to
be guaranteed equal opportunities and equal rights." - P.R.Sarkar

To enjoy more pls. click here >

http://proutist.fi/content/evolution-society-p-r-sarkarELL - Part -1]

" No social class should dominate society. If one class is dominant
the other classes will surely be exploited. Therefore everyone is to
be guaranteed equal opportunities and equal rights." - P.R.Sarkar

To enjoy more pls. click here >

http://proutist.fi/content/evolution-society-p-r-sarkar